Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
How much sway case law holds may well fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To explore this concept, think about the following case regulation definition.
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made distinct that police is free to just take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-area duties in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The official court record is maintained from the court of record. Copies of case file documents will not be offered within the search site and will need to be ordered from the court of record.
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. From the meantime police shall remain neutral in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall take prompt action against them under legislation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is actually unclear the way it applies to any given situation, generally rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and also the circumstances in the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a perfectly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But here that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the regulation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to in the state court, for the same level.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if content that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.